Jesus and I just had a wonderful dinner with PastorDave at that most American of Gourmet Restaurants. As it happens, there's a "Waffle House" situated about 50 yards from the hotel room, and Dave was kind enough to drive over to meet us. We had a good time yapping for an hour or so, and if I'm not mistaken? - we solved every problem known to mankind!
Looking forward to an early breakfast too, then we'll get back on 75 south and make our way through the southern half of the state before hitting the Florida border, hopefully by noon or so.
So far, I've enjoyed the trip immensely.
I do live in a beautiful country.
The two tackiest things I've seen today, of course, had to do with what appeared to be three mega churches. There's the big ol' stucco covered Styrofoam bust of Jesus in Southern Ohio near Franklin (see Alm's archives for pics of it - Jesus snickered!) that's just plain grotesque in both scale and workmanship, and 2 big ol' identical crosses at either end of Tennessee that appear to be covered in aluminum siding.
Wonder if they got a warranty?
What is it about mega churches and gaudy icons? No one with any taste at all would be caught dead attending any of them.
"Hey, want to visit my Church some time?"
"Um, maybe. Which one is it?"
"It's the one with the to-go cup Jesus out front."
"Oh. Nah. I attend the one with the Crucifix that blasts off into space every Sunday morning."
Which reminds me of the Mega Church in Fort Lauderdale I've written about before that sends a skywriter up every Sunday morning to write "Jesus Loves You" directly over the building (except, of course the "Love" is replaced by a valentines heart, you know, like the notes your wrote in junior high.)
T minus... Today. Hope to be on the road by noon-ish.
Pastor Dave commented yesterday that he enjoys long trips and someday hopes to walk the Appalachian trail. It triggered a memory. Actually, I might have written about here a year ago or so, but hey, my life isn't all that exciting and it's a good story.
It's March 1st, 1975.
At my hippie/artsy-fartsy house in Kalamazoo, where I live with five other guys in a building that until a few years earlier had been a frat house for some fraternity or other associated with Western Michigan University, a huge party is in progress. The Uranian Quiverquest, an invention of the most talented of us, Jan Flechsig, is intended to celebrate the coming Spring and is attended by no fewer than two hundred of our "closest friends."
The party is waning, and at two o'clock in the morning, four of us pile into my van, as planned, our equipment pre-packed, to make our way to the Cumberland Gap to begin our six day, seventy mile back-packing trip along the first leg of the Appalachian trail. Long planned for, all of us were experienced hikers, and we'd thought of EVERYTHING.
Taking turns driving and sleeping, and after stopping for a last big breakfast, we arrive at the base of the mountain by one in the afternoon. We stop at a place we'd heard about to get updates on the weather and find out any last minute info we might be able make use of.
We're told that there are some people missing on the trail and that we MUST buy tire chains before we'll be allowed up the road to Five Points, where we're beginning our trek.
Annoyed, we bought the chains and made our way up the mountain slowly.
We parked in the plowed lot and put on our gear. We could see the sign for the trail sticking up out of the snow less than a hundred yards away.
With smiles all around, we headed out.
The minute we left the parking lot, the snow was up to our waists. Hah! We trudged through and walked. And walked... it was slow going... really slow.
Thirty minutes later we reach the sign that marks the start of the trail, which sits on a pole at least four feet high, but is completely covered by snow. We are absolutely exhausted. I turn around and look back toward the parking lot. It looks like we've made it the length of a football field. I turn back and everyone is looking at me. No one says a word.
We stand there for a full minute, then as one, we head back toward the car, and easier trip since we've plowed a trail through the snow with our bodies. Still no one says a word.
We remove our packs, brush off as much of the snow that covers us as we can, we pile back into the van and slowly, slowly drive back down the mountain. slipping more than once, even with the chains.
At the bottom of the mountain, I pulled over and struggled to remove the tire chains. I drive back toward the highway. The van's occupants remain completely silent, shame I assume, clamping our tongues.
As we arrive at the interstate, at a red light, we chance meeting each other's eyes and and suddenly grins of shared silliness erupt into laughter. One of the girls says one word.
T minus two... Or is it one? I'm leaving sometime tomorrow, in any case.
The list is growing instead of getting smaller.
Oh, the "things to take" part isn't getting much longer, but the "things to do before leaving" portion seems to grow with each few passing minutes. Annoying.
Seems like every time I cross something off that part of the list, I add two new items.
And hell, it's just me I'm responsible for. Jesus is packing for himself; one backpack as usual I assume. It's not like when the kids were little and we had to get them ready to go and take care of all those things. I don't even have to cancel the paper, or have someone collect the mail, or arrange for a pet to be fed, or contact any team coaches to let them know that one of the kids won't be at practice for the next couple of weeks, or make arrangements for schoolwork to be done during the trip, or make sure the lawn is mowed just before leaving so it doesn't get ridiculously long while we're gone, or any of that stuff.
Still, lots to remember... just more rudimentary now:
My hope is to be in Detroit to pick up Jesus by three-thirty or so tomorrow, and then start to head south by four. Hope to be in Kentucky by midnight after possibly stopping in Cinci for a bit (and for Skyline or Gold Star!)
Love them baby coneys, (though even when I lived there back in the eighties, I could never get into the chili on spaghetti thing. Call me crazy. Jesus loves it. He gets a four-way.)
It's 6:20 a.m. I've been up for an hour, and I'm not as awake as I think I ought be. Slept alright, but the lids are dragging down this morning. Perhaps because I had the strangest dream I can recall in quite a while.
I know where it stemmed from.
Was reading an article in a "writer's rag" the other days in which the author was complaining about the overuse and misuse of adjectives and adverbs, a not uncommon theme in such publications.
So last night, while sleeping soundly, and in the fashion of Indiana Jones, (even had the vest, whip and hat) I searched long and hard for "quick, huge and fast," which I found around the alcove of a cave just after I'd dodged a boulder that rolled toward me, trapping me temporarily. I'd have used those very words to describe the rolling rock but until I found them, tied up against the wall of the cave, they'd been unavailable to me.
Later I met a beautiful woman and fell madly in love "instantly," but was again unable to use the right descriptive words to let her know how I felt, because they were locked up not twenty feet away in a prison cell created for the very purpose of keeping them from my use. She indicated, pointing to a wall, where she thought I'd find them and, using the whip to smash through, I released "auburn-haired, voluptuous and velvety," as well as "sincerely, miraculously, and flawless."
Getting to the heart of the conspiracy, I found that I was unable to convey just how evil the evil guy was because he'd not only imprisoned the words that might help me, but he'd drugged them too. When I finally found "delusional and psychotic," they'd become "mixed-up and confused." Freeing them was going to be tough because the ropes were coated with some sort of hardened plastic... I got out my lighter.
I was about to try melting their bindings when my brain got a signal from my bladder, interrupting my adventure. When I went back to sleep, a few minutes later, I was playing right field for the 1968 Detroit Tigers... brilliantly.
Cloudy day in the neighborhood. A few little white flakey things blowing in the wind, but don't see any of them landing. Must be about exactly 32 degrees outside (or zero for you centigrade-ians. Eh?)
As I get ready for this trip, I find myself making a list of the things I need to make sure to take. This "listing" process has become more and more important over the past few years as my memory shifts slowly from "useful tool" to "over burdened file cabinet" and the short term and long term memory functions merge into a single entity, lacking both a name and as yet, an efficient search system I can use to sort through the files.
If I don't write it down? Forget it. -Which, oddly enough, is just what I do!
Last week one of my customers gave me one of his customer's phone number. He wanted me to call the person to set an appointment for us to get together. I was in the middle of something at the time so I slipped the paper into my back left pocket and said I'd call a bit later. He said there was no hurry.
That was Wednesday I think. I just came across the slip of paper this morning as I was sorting through receipts and the like that I jam into that pocket during the week and go through on weekends; transferring the ever-growing lump from each pair of pants I wear during the week.
Upon stumbling on it this morning as I logged my sundry expenses, it took me a good three minutes of solid thought to even remember what the paper was and why I had this unknown person's name and phone number (in someone else's handwriting) in the first place. I was pretty sure I hadn't asked this person for her phone number, (the first name "Larry" being a pretty good clue.)
I'm 49. What will I be like in ten years? -Or twenty?
So every day I go through my little mental exercises.
My name is surrogate.
My social security number is...
My drivers license number is...
I have two children who's names are....
I live in the United States of America in Michigan at...
We drive on the right side of the road.
Check your gas gauge when you start the car and your oil when you fill up.
Does your laundry need doing?
Use six little scoops when you make coffee, (you like a little half'n'half and half a teaspoon of sugar in it.)
Over the next five days, I'll be getting ready to take a little jaunt down to Florida.
Many of you know that I lived down there for a couple of years till about a year ago. When I was down there I started up a little wood-shop specializing in making some interesting upscale playhouses (and some other outdoor products) for people with more money than I ever had when raising my kids, but it was a lot of fun. (The pic I use in the profile is of one of the playhouses I made for a retired Marlins pitcher's kids.)
A few things went kaflooey after we had a wonderful first year, the first four hurricane season on record being one of the factors that helped convince me that perhaps I ought close down till I had a lot more money to sustain lean times. (When people are busy trying to get their homes back in shape, the last thing they need to think about is more stuff that might be damaged next time.)
I'm glad I did shut down as last summer was no better for the folks in the market areas I was targeting. In fact, a couple of the playhouses I built a few years ago were damaged in Wilma. One of them was lifted and moved a few feet, and the front porch was torn off. I'm going to attempt to put that one back together for my customer while I'm down there.
Along the way, my traveling companion (see Friday's post) and I will be visiting a few friends. My hope is to stop and post each day at libraries in the some of the cities I pass through.
When I lived down there, I drove or flew back and forth to Michigan any number of times, always, is seemed, in a rush. This time I'm going to allow myself a full four days to make the trip down, both to see old friends and meet some newer ones, plus I plan on stopping every damn time I feel like it to check out some of the zillions of tourist traps advertised along the way. (I want fodder - for this blog and other writing projects.)
I'll be gone a couple of weeks. When I get back? A nice change is in the offing for me. More about that some other time.
A friend emailed this to me... Man have I been out of touch lately.
On Wednesday, March 1st, 2006, in Annapolis at a hearing on the proposed Constitutional Amendment to prohibit gay marriage, Jamie Raskin, professor of law at AU, was requested to testify.
At the end of his testimony, Republican Senator Nancy Jacobs said: "Mr. Raskin, my Bible says marriage is only between a man and a woman. What do you have to say about that?"
Raskin replied: "Senator, when you took your oath of office, you placed your hand on the Bible and swore to uphold the Constitution. You did not place your hand on the Constitution and swear to uphold the Bible."
The room erupted into applause.
Simple. Hope it's true.
Update.
Evidently it is true. Read on if you like. Copied from Snopes.com
February 2006, Baltimore Circuit Court Judge M. Brooke Murdock ruled that a Maryland state law banning same-sex marriages was unconstitutional. In response to that decision, state lawmakers opposed to same-sex marriage introduced a resolution to impeach Judge Murdock (a move which was defeated in the Judiciary Committee) and a bill calling for the amendment of Maryland's constitution to prohibit all same-sex marriages.
Although the bill failed to garner sufficient support for passage, it was reintroduced in a version that would define marriage as a union between a man and a women only but would still allow for civil unions. The latter bill was being debated by a Senate committee on 1 March 2006, when, according to the Baltimore Sun, "Clergy, constitutional law experts and children of gay parents were among those who packed the Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee room to speak out on the issue."
Part of that debate featured some give-and-take between Nancy Jacobs, a Republican state senator, and Jamin Raskin, a professor of constitutional law from Washington's American University over the influence of the Bible on modern law. The Sun reported the following exchange taking place between the two: "As I read Biblical principles, marriage was intended, ordained and started by God — that is my belief," [Jacobs] said. "For me, this is an issue solely based on religious principals [sic]."
Raskin shot back that the Bible was also used to uphold now-outlawed statutes banning interracial marriage, and that the constitution should instead be lawmakers' guiding principle.
"People place their hand on the Bible and swear to uphold the Constitution; they don't put their hand on the Constitution and swear to uphold the Bible," he said.
Some in the room applauded, which led committee chairman Sen. Brian E. Frosh, a Democrat from Montgomery County, to call for order. "This isn't a football game," he said.
Assuming the Sun's account is accurate, we note that the version of events quoted at the head of this page has been somewhat altered and compressed to make the exchange more direct and personal (i.e., Senator Jacobs' statement about marriage and the Bible has been simplified, and she did not issue a "What do you have to say about that?" challenge; Professor Raskin's response referred to people in general, not to Senator Jacobs specifically; and although some spectators applauded, the room did not "erupt into applause"), but the setting and gist of Professor Raskin's statement are correctly reported.
We don't know if Professor Raskin should get credit for originating this quip, however, because the concept has been used before. For example, comedian Bill Maher said the following (in reference to the Terry Schiavo case) during the 1 April 2005 broadcast of his HBO television program, Real Time with Bill Maher:
The Federal Appeals Court in Atlanta scolded [Congress and the President] the other day for acting in a manner they said, "demonstrably at odds with our founding fathers' blueprint." There are laws named after one person, like the Miranda laws, but they don't just apply to Mr. Miranda. They apply to everyone. Not so with the Schiavo Law. Does George Bush remember that he put his hand on the Bible to uphold the Constitution and not the other way around?
"I'm fine. I'm in Detroit. Thought maybe you'd be coming over this way in the next couple of days."
"Detroit? Wow. I was there yesterday morning and yeah, actually I'm coming back over tonight. Ry's Band is playing tonight and I'm going with Andrea."
"No way. Wow. Damn. I'm busy tonight or I'd invite myself along."
"Why are you in Motown?"
"Personal stuff, really. Do you remember that Old Church on Lafayette that closed ten or twelve years ago that's now an art gallery?"
"Sure. I know a couple of people who've worked there over the years. Kind of a strange gallery. Lot of stuff taken from other closed churches from all over the country. Art, Sculptures, tons of stained glass windows... Not much of the stuff is from any later than 1900. That's their cut-off I think. What about it?"
"There's a small stained glass window there that was taken from a church in Italy about 1942 and used at a church here in Detroit till the place closed a few years ago. I'm friends with the Priest of the Church in Italy and I thought I'd surprise him by buying that window and returning it to him."
"Oh wow. Cool. Is there an auction or something or are you just gonna buy it?"
"I'm just gonna buy it. They're not asking all that much for it. I don't think they know where it came from exactly, other than they know it's Italian. And I think they know about when it was made. I don't think I'll clue them in on the rest till I've made the deal and paid for it."
"Why Jesus, you shrewd bargainer!"
"Well, when in Rome."
"I guess. It's not like you're trying to profit from it."
"Of course not. I don't do "profit." Not my bailiwick."
"(chuckle) Don't suppose it is. Do you need my help with this?"
"Maybe. The damn thing is roughly four by six and weighs a couple of hundred pounds. I don't know how to actually get it back to Italy. It's not exactly Carry-on."
"Oh. No worries. Either ask them to send it, or ask them to deliver it to that packaging store on Woodward near Catalpa. I forget the name, but they're really good. I've used them before. Probably any of those places could do it."
"Really?"
"Yep. Where are you staying?"
"With Ralph and Lena. They said to say hi."
"Oh great. How are they?"
"Good. I need to get to Florida next week sometime."
"No way. Really?"
"Yeah. I'm going to a wedding in Miami next Saturday night."
"Well isn't THIS something. Want a ride?"
"That's why I called."
"You sneaky guy. GREAT! The surro-bus leaves Wednesday. I'm hoping to see a couple of friends along the way. They'd love to meet you I'll bet. How cool! I'd LOVE to have you come along. You know that."
"I was hoping you would."
"Alright! I'll pick you up at their house then?"
"Sounds good. I'll call Tuesday. You'll know about when by then, right?"
"Yeah. I already know I'm leaving around noon."
"Good. Then I'll see you around three?"
"Sounds like! Wow. Thanks!"
"See you then sur."
"Bye."
(click)
Be good to everyone.
"Perhaps you didn't hear me any of the first three times I explained it to you."
Have to get back to you all later tonight or tomorrow.
I'm at the library 90 miles from home and I don't have time to write anything much worth reading.
I'll leave you with a question though, to which you must respond under penalty of... well, something, and you damn well won't like it - that I can promise you. When you talk to a person in an authority position, and they're rude, how do you deal with it?
Just had an experience with someone being extra condescending. I was extremely annoyed but I think I handled it in a fairly creative manner, which I'll go into tomorrow perhaps. Until then, how do you handle situations like that?
Remember learning about jigsaw puzzles as a little kid? No? Probably not. I don't.
But, like me, surely you've watched small children working hard at learning to put them together at some point in your life. They're usually brightly colored, sometimes wood, and have a dozen pieces or so.
Ever notice the catharsis that takes place when they realize that there's simply no forcing the pieces? -that they simply must wait to find the right piece; that even if they manage to get a couple of pieces jammed together that don't really fit, it doesn't help them complete the picture?
I remember seeing that take place a number of times in my life, both when it happened with my own kids, and with other children I've been around when they were two or three years old. It's something that little people have to learn for themselves. Until that connection is made, finally, the task isn't all that much fun for kids. Once it IS made? They'll put the same puzzle together dozens, or even hundreds of times over the next few weeks, getting faster and faster at it, until, comfortable with their understanding of the process, they finally move on to bigger ones.
Later on in life, we use the same process time and time again. We force ourselves into jobs, relationships and friendships that simply may not fit together properly. Sometimes we do everything in our power to make things fit together, even if it doesn't help fill out the picture. And, like a puzzle discovered on the top shelf of closet in a rented cabin, probably in a worn plain box, we may have no idea what the picture is ahead of time anyway, or even whether all the pieces are there.
Once in while though, serendipitously, amongst hundreds, we grab a pair of pieces that fit together perfectly the very first time we try to put them together, and it gives us a smile and little moment of joy and surprise that helps us forge ahead.
To me, life is that discovered puzzle in the old box. I don't want to see the picture ahead of time, nor do I want it to be too small a puzzle with just a few pieces, where the picture is obvious soon after starting.
Let me work life slowly finding pieces that fit. Let me trust that, even if some pieces are missing, that when I'm done, perhaps there will be enough there for me to see the picture, and feel a sense of joy and accomplishment for having worked the process.
Let me be thankful for discovering the puzzle, rather than for it's completion.
Was watching book notes on Cspan yesterday afternoon, assuming I was using it as a lullaby prior to a nap. The wonderful novelist Walter Mosley was doing an interview with Harry Belafonte, the longtime entertainer and philanthropist and, of late, muck raking anti-war activist who caused such a stir a few months ago with his speech in... Wasn't it Venezuela?
Anyway, it's not important to my "point o'the day" so I won't bother to look it up. At one point during the interview Mosley was making a point about how careful we have to be to avoid becoming an oligarchy here in the U.S. And he used an example I thought was really apt.
He said, and I'm paraphrasing here, "It's all about access. If we're in a room full of people, picked at random, with the President, a few of whom have given the given the president hundreds of thousands of dollars in political contributions, and most have given nothing, but EVERYONE there has the phone number of the president and can talk with him any time they like? Then we might be living in a democracy. If only the people who have given big money to the president have access to that number? Then we're close to living in a oligarchy...
Cool point... except. Would this president EVER be in a room full of randomly picked Americans to test the theory? And if he wouldn't be, what does THAT say about the state of our government?
Think a phone call from any of us would be accepted?
Oh, I know. Probably true for just about any President in the last hundred years, or since the phone could have used for such an offhand attempt at communication. But with these folks, I have the feeling that a call from a citizen would automatically be considered a threat from a kook, and might very well make the citizen a target of investigation or worse - unless, of course, the callers name, when cross-referenced, showed up on a list of sympathetic mega-donors...
Oh good. Fine. Always glad to be talking to the right party in cases like this. Wouldn't you agree sir? Mr. surrogate, sir.?"
"I suppose. Listen my name's just surrogate, Not Mr. surrogate, or Just Surrogate, or even Mr. just surrogate. It's SURROGATE. Got it?"
"Yes sir Mr. surrogate-got-it. Fine. Just fine sir. Now sir, my name's Findgold. I'm with Yellowstone and McKinley."
"Yellowstone and McKinley. Like the National Parks?"
"One would think so, wouldn't one? -But no, I'm an attorney. I'm just an associate here."
"An attorney? What's this about? My divorce has been final for almost five years."
"Sir, yesterday morning I received a call from a Mrs. Stella Quill. She was quite upset, hysterical actually. She said you'd killed her husband and that the police wouldn't do a thing about it."
"I did WHAT???"
"Killed her husband sir. She said you flattened him like ground beef in a cookie press, sir. Her words, sir, not mine."
"I've never heard of this woman. I certainly didn't... What was her name?"
"Quill sir. Mrs. Stella Quill. She's a porcupine sir."
"Wha... Oh. (sighs.) Oh.(breathes in and out loudly a time or two.) I'm afraid she's right. I did kill him. The night before last. She called the police?"
"Of course sir. Wouldn't you?"
"Um... I guess. Why are you calling me. I mean I felt horrible about it, but he did run right in front of my car."
"Regardless, sir, Mrs. Quill feels you are morally, and therefore... financially responsible."
"I see. Financially... interesting. What did Mrs. Quill have in mind."
"Oh, sir. That's not for us, I mean, Mrs. Quill to decide. No, that will be up to the jury sir."
"Jury?"
"I'd imagine so sir. Legally, you won't be found guilty of any crime, but our position is that you are civilly responsible for the death and lost earning power of Mr. Quill, and, of course, for the loss and comfort of Mrs. Quill's life partner. A terrible thing, don't you agree sir?"
"I'll send you a hundred bucks."
"That will do nicely sir. Why don't I send someone around to collect it from you."
"Fine."
"He's just outside your door now sir." (doorbell rings)
"Wow. You're pretty efficient."
"I thank you for saying so, sir."
"You do this often?"
"You have no idea sir. Now place one hundred dollars in an envelope and give it to the squirrel at your door." (doorbell rings again, twice.)
I yell toward the door, "JUST A MINUTE!" Then, back into the phone I say. "This is nothing more than a shakedown, is it?"
"Call it what you like sir. Got to run. Lots more phone calls to make!"
(click)
I scurry around the apartment to look for an envelope and then try to remember if I have enough cash in my wallet. The doorbell rings again, repeatedly, insistent. I hear impatient squeaky chatter through the door....
Yesterday I did a lot of driving. Early in the day I ran over the body of a dead rabbit that had obviously just been killed. There wasn't anything I could do about it as I was on a narrow two lane road with heavy traffic. No room to swerve. Made a horrid "thunk" as I drove over it.
Then, last night on the expressway I came as close to hitting a deer as I have in years. The large doe was frozen in the road directly in front of me. Thankfully, I was was in the right lane traveling at about 65 mph and there was no one in the left lane giving me room to swerve to the left. It was really close and I was breathing fast for a minute or two afterward. I called a friend on my cell to calm my nerves and was reminded that sometimes it's safer to just take out the deer... I'm not sure it would have been in this case. This was a big deer for a female whitetail, or maybe it was a buck sans the rack. I don't know the "schedule" as far as what time of the year they loose the antlers.
So at that point I was about thirty miles from home. I decided to stop and grab a coffee from a truck-stop I know has a good dark-roast. The second I veered off the exit, a brown form the size of a medium sized dog ran in front of my car. I hit it hard and then rolled over it making an awful sound. My heart went to my throat and I pulled over.
I'd killed a large porcupine.
I had the coffee "in" at the truck stop and let my nerves settle down.
Don't remember actually hitting anything in a very long time. I hit a kitten once years ago and felt horrid for weeks. That must have been over twenty years ago.
Was sure glad to get back here last night.
A real road trip is in the offing in a week or two. Hope I don't plow down any more creatures.
Be good to everyone.
Hey... Do you like it when people are really good at what they do? Me too. Check this out.
And a top'o th'morning to ya, my wee Lads and Lassies!
Yer old pal surrogate here, wishing he twas a drinker so he could swill down a bunch of green beer later tonight....alas, (and slowly easing out of the fake accent and back... into... surrogate-speak) -the idea of green beer makes him (a wee bit) disgusted.
Finally saw Brokeback Mountain yesterday.
Pretty good movie, but...
Nice music, great scenery, tons of sheep and two guys for whom I just couldn't work up much sympathy.
The story starts in 1963 and runs for twenty-years or so, meaning the end takes place in the early to mid eighties.
Maybe things were that bad for gay people out west in the boonies (as depicted by a flashback scene in which one of the character's fathers takes his brother and him, each of them a year or so on one side or the other of ten years old at the time, to see the body of a mutilated gay man left dead and member-less by some less than tolerant psychopath, perhaps the boys' father, himself.)
Still, I had a very hard time feeling sympathetic toward the characters. I felt very sorry for their wives and kids. The most powerful scene in the movie to me was when Ennis's wife glances out the window and sees a more than friendly greeting between the two men. How she managed to stay in the marriage for a few more years after seeing that, I don't know. Seemed a bit unrealistic to me.
Not sure if my problem with the movie was that, that I just didn't much like the two main characters or maybe I was trying to see the "Hollywood Agenda" shining through in the script and the directing.
Sure didn't romanticize the idea of being gay in my mind, as has been suggested.
What I saw were two unremarkable men living irresponsibly with the feelings they discovered within themselves and for each other.
I suppose the movie DOES promote the idea that people ought not have to live with the negative stigma associated with being gay, and that that stigma has screwed up lots of lives. Maybe it even points out how important it is to allow gay folks to be open about their sexuality and marry if they see fit. However, if that was the AGENDA behind producing the movie? -they sure missed the mark. I'd think they'd have written the characters as more likable people.
And maybe, since those first two points in the last paragraph are "givens" in my head, I found the plot little more than sad. Any sympathies I worked up in my head and heart were for the wives and kids left in the ruins.
I'm asked often whether I think "conservative" folks, or at least people who consider themselves conservatives can be sincere people.
Of course they can. Hell, I hate the labels. I don't even consider myself a liberal for that matter. I think through an issue, make my decision about it and, unless facts I discover later change my mind about it, that's it. That's the position I take.
As it happens, the way I end up coming down on most things throws me into the camp of "liberals." So be it.
Now I'll paint with a broad brush. You'll have to stand back a bit to see the picture. Don't expect much detail.
In the first few centuries of the history of this country, human slavery was legal in many of our states. "Conservatives" made the following three main arguments with regard to it's practice.
1. Black folks were not really people. (The negotiated figure was 3/5 of a person)
2. God sanctioned the practice because it's talked about extensively in the Bible, therefore ending it would be contrary to scripture.
3. The economy of the South depended on it. To end it would be catastrophic.
Then the "fake" argument: Washington should not interfere with an individual State's right to treat people (and creatures that were only 3/5 of a person) any way they damn well please.
It was this fake argument that lead to war, in which 350,000 people and creatures that were only 3/5 of a person died. Why fake? -Because it's always used to justify untenable things.
So it was with getting women the vote 50 years later.
And desegregation 50 years after that.
And again today with regard to the social issues that face the country.
I'm not overly bright, but the disconnect is jarring, even to me.
Many of these folks, in fact, long for the good old days.
Most conservatives I've met seem to believe fiercely that it is the right of individuals to live their lives as they see fit without the intrusion of a large central government. This, of course, while pursuing laws that prohibit others to live their lives as THEY see fit.
If only they'd allow others the same freedom they insist upon for themselves.
Won't happen.
Why?
They ARE sincere.
Just selfishly wrong too often and for far too long. But, there's no doubt they are wrong - "sincerely."
What's funny is that I'll bet you'd have a hard time getting a conservative of today to acknowledge that 150 years ago, or a 100 years ago, or 50 years ago that they'd have been on the side of the slavers, the "women belong in the kitchen" brigade, or the "separate but equal" bunch, respectively. Most would indignantly scoff at the suggestion, because admitting that? -would be admitting way too much, and might be a clue for themselves that their world view is.... well.
Well, just checked my account here on tBlog. Overnight, I had seven pages of (non-tblog visit) and "deleted" clicks. I'd sure like to see those sorts of hits simply not be shown on the counter or reflected in the account pages.
Just my two cents.
Looks like just a dusting of snow overnight. The wind still howls but thankfully, no real storms or tornados around here, at least that I've heard about.
Reread my post from yesterday in which I lambasted poor writing, and found four errors of my own. Shows-ta-go-ya! -as my Dad used to say, though to be fair to myself, I wasn't really talking about typos or minor syntax screw-ups.
An update. Last week the guy I was trying to buy equipment from lowered his price to my "magic number." I still decided against it.
Chicken. (Hangs head in shame.)
Can't say I'm completely thrilled doing what I do, but I get by fine for now and though I know I should probably figure out a way to make more money over the next ten years. I think I'd rather either resurrect another idea from the vaults in my head (a virtual treasure trove of partially roughed out business ideas) or go about this same project I was going to get into by buying this equipment, but in an different manner and at a speed that would create less pressure on my fragile little itsy-bitsy psyche. (Can I have a communal, "Aww, poor baby." Hey, just a damn minute. What do you mean, "No."?)
Ya know when your lip spits in the winter, and it keeps partially healing and then you smile widely at something, and it splits open again - and again? I've got one of those going. I need a magic healing kiss. Volunteers? (Hey, just a damn minute. What do you mean, "No."?)
Have a nice day folks.
And?
B.G.T.E.
Here's to life, liberty, and a relaxing weekend. (clink)
I did virtually nothing productive this weekend. Ended up not working Saturday. Twas lovely. First time I've taken two days off in a row since August.
By the time I got back here last night around six, I decided to continue the laziness and didn't even write a post.
Coffee's done.
Ahhh.
Thunderstorms overnight. Woke up to some boomers a couple of times and as I look out the window here to my left, it looks like a few inches down, the ground must still be frozen because there are deep puddles all over the place.
Did bounce around tblog for a while and caught up on some of the many blogs I try to read semi-regularly. We are blessed to have a lot of thoughtful folks writing here, and, unfortunately far too many who seem to leave their brains at the door in favor of simply posting copied tripe from sources that no thinking person would give any credence to in the first place.
Things I continue to see that, at least, annoy me:
> Hate and fear couched in terms that seem to justify it by attributing the Bible as the the source authority. It's the most common and disturbing trend here on tblog as well as on many of the other blog sites (and in much of the mass-media.) Terms like "God loves the sinner but hates the sin" is all well and good except if it's used to label another's whole life or self image as sinful. This is especially true when one continually goes out of their way to be loudly judgmental - a sin in itself according to that same authority (if I'm not mistaken.) To my mind, fostering hate is the most evil thing that can be done in the name of God.
> I'm shocked by the level of writing displayed by many college kids. For every lucid, thoughtful, well written post I read, there seem to be five by kids who have no idea how to put a sentence together. Maybe it's style and I'm just too old and set in my ways to "except" it. (I ran across this particular error - accept vs. except - three times last night.)
> I'm shocked and dismayed by the number of people who still make excuses for this administration's handling of the war. And their number one defense? -Left wingers are nut-jobs. Who's a left-wing nut-job? -Anyone who questions the administration's handling of the war, of course. That's the logic being employed. These folks would have jailed Copernicus even AFTER the world was circumnavigated.
The sun is shining. It's really beautiful outside. Went for a walk this morning. Went by a little spot I discovered in the autumn that hasn't been as much fun to visit in the winter.
About a half a mile from here, there's a clearing in a wooded windbreak alongside a corn-field with a couple of large bench-like rocks and a little brook that runs between them. I sat to watch the water run for a few minutes. I was down because of an event I was really looking forward to this evening that I won't be attending. My cell rang.
"Hello?"
"Morning sur."
"Hi Jesus! How are you?"
"I'm fine. You're down, huh?"
"Yeah. You know why I assume?"
"Yeah, I know. Can you do anything that would allow you to go?"
"Nah. Been thinking about it all week. If things are as I assume they must be? I'd ruin everyone else's' fun. That wouldn't be fair."
"You can't just go and watch and leave?"
"Yeah, but that would be even ruder."
"Maybe so. Oh well, you know your heart."
"So do you, evidently."
"Yeah. True. I do. So what's up for today?"
"Work. Then I might go hit some golf balls with a friend."
"Nice day for it."
"Sure is. You ever play?"
"Nah. No time for that stuff. Listen. What are we gonna do to get you over this hump sur? This has gone on for way too long. You asked for my help, but sometimes I'm not sure you really want it."
"Grief. I'm just lousy at it. Can't make my way through the whole process I guess. I get stuck somewhere along the way and hope creeps in. Screws everything up."
"Huh... I know. But still..."
"Why on earth do I get like this. I'm a decent person aren't I? Hell, just about everyone goes through this sort of crap... Why does it paralyze me like this?"
"Just who you are... which is fine, but, to use a programmer's term, there IS a workaround. You just have to stop trying to load that page."
"I know. Feel like I can't hit the "delete" key."
"Well, you're the one who has to do it. Remember when you were a kid and you took piano lessons?"
"Yeah. Mr. Zeidler. Cool guy."
"Do you remember how he'd handle it when you started making the same mistake repeatedly in a piece?"
"Sure. He'd ask me to play the measure backwards a few times and then forward, but slowly, and in a different octave - usually also a couple of times."
"Right. Remember why?"
"He'd call it "un-training my mind" so I actually HEARD it differently."
"Exactly. it worked too didn't it?"
"Yeah. And usually quickly."
"I think you need to un-train your mind about all this stuff too."
"Yeah. I do. Feel like I've tried everything."
"Play it through in your mind backwards a few times."
"Okay. Thanks Jesus."
"Nice place you've found there."
"It is. You've been here?"
"I was with you when you found it."
"(chuckle.) Got it. Thanks for calling."
"Hit-'em straight!"
"You're something!"
"You too sur. Don't forget it."
"Thanks. Bye."
"Bye."
(click.)
Shoot first, ask questions later (after a mutually assured destruction has taken place.)
Maybe rcurry can fill us in over the next few days. Hope he's okay over there.
It's sounding more and more like there are plans for either shutting things down to some degree in Iraq or shifting the focus to it's neighbor.
Pretty weird.
I suppose the logic of considering attacking Iran is predicated on the assumption that if they get nukes, as it appears they're well on their way to doing, that they'd be likely to use them, since even though they'd certainly be aware that it would mean the destruction of their country as well, and quickly too, that since they've got that "martyr = great rewards" mentality thing, it would be worth it to them.
I'm assuming that that's the logic the U.S. is using to justify any impending conflict. Has to be SOMETHING like that since the list of world-wide nuke powers is quite lengthy, and we've stopped even trying to dismantle some 400 old ones in the Old Soviet territories left over from the Cold War.
The Cold War. Ahhhh. Remember it? When for three and a half decades we had an enemy that made Iraq and Iran look like the relatively minor powers they are?
And remember that during all that time, despite threats, and build-ups, and the odd killing of each others spies (in order to give folks like John laCarre, Tom Clancy and Ian Flemming decades worth of fodder for their work) neither side ever did the one thing that would have wrecked the world for good. Neither side openly fired the first shot in anger.
Sometimes I wonder. If GWB had been president when the Soviets were the big enemy, would any of us still be here today?
Anyone remember Steven King's book (or the movie) "The Dead Zone"? Remember Martin Sheen's role?
Sometimes I think of that character when I see George Bush doing his best to justify things that strike me as unjustifiable.
Allygirl tagged me. I'd promised to do this yesterday, but woke up with the dumb idea for yesterday's post and I forgot.
Six things about me you might not know... (or care to know.)
1. In the middle of the night if I wake up with a runny nose and I use a tissue? It goes on the floor till morning.
2. I throw away cutting boards every few months, no matter how much I've used them.
3. I had a full beard for a long long time, but shaved it off a few years ago and I'm this close (holds thumb and fore-finger a quarter-inch apart) to growing a new one - which would probably be at least partially gray by now..
4. I love babies and make most smile when I look at them and wave. (I've yet to discover whether this is because they think I'm friendly or funny looking.)
5. Dogs tend to like me instantly. Cats? Not so much - but with a few exceptions.
6. I deal with loss and disappointment exceptionally poorly, and would kill to turn off my mind for a couple of years or have at least some of my long term memories exorcised.
Exciting stuff huh? That's why I rarely do these.
Now, I'm supposed to tag six people... Let's do it like this. If you've commented here more than once in the last couple of weeks?
Tag.
Be good to everyone.
Wow. I just ran spell check and for the first time in about six months didn't have any tyyypos. (Damn.)
"I work for Google. Well, I'm a consultant actually. You just signed up to host some ads on your blog?"
"(cringing) Yeah. I did. I feel like a whore."
"Oh Mr. surrogate, no reason to feel like that! Why some of the finest blogs in blogland sell advertising... You have READERS Mr. surrogate. And that's what we want!"
"Please. I have the same half-dozen friends who comment every day. I have no idea if the rest of the "hits" are even real!"
"Oh they're real alright Mr. Surrogate..."
"Please, just "surrogate.""
"Very well sir. Mr. Just-surrogate, are you aware of the amazing things going on in cyberspace of late?"
"Well, some of it. Why? What are you talking about? And come to think of it, why did you call me? You people have time to call every schmo who signs up for ad-sense?"
"Oh no sir. You're quite right there. We call very few people. We feel your blog is.... special."
"Special? Okay. Right... Let's hear it. What the hell is this about?"
"Well sir, to be perfectly frank, this is a pilot program, and I'm sort of feeling my way through this. We're looking for, um, hack writers."
"Oh. Well, gee, thanks."
"But sir, not just ANY hack writers. No sir! We're looking for the sort who seem to stir things up within their own little blog communities by saying outlandish things."
"Outlandish?"
"Well, outlandish as far as... our "partners" are concerned."
"Your partners? Come on... Get to it. Why did you call."
"Yes Sir, Mr. Just-surrogate. Just so. It's really quite simple... We'd like you to write posts based on the ads we're running on your blog."
"Huh?"
"If we run a women's swimsuit ad on your blog, we'd like you to cross-promote it in your copy... say something about how much you like women's swim-suits... If we advertise chocolates? You talk about how am Almond Joy would just hit the spot this very instant. That sort of thing - you know sir, like they do on television and in the movies?"
"I thought it worked the other way. I thought the search engines read through the words in my posts and found ads that "fit."
"Oh sir! We do! We just want it all to go both ways and backwards and forwards - and through and through to boot!"
"Synergy huh?"
"Synergy. Exactly so sir. Just the right word! Synergy."
"Cool. Sure. I supposed I could do it if the remuneration was sufficient... (I'm winking at the phone, trying to sound sly.)"
"Remuneration sir?"
"The pay. The jack. The cheese. The... MONEY."
"Oh sir. There's no money involved... for you anyway."
"Well... What do I get out of it?"
"Oh. Didn't I make that clear? I really thought I had."
"No."
"Oh I'm sorry."
"What's in it for me, then?"
"We let you live sir."
"Oh. (gulp) Wow."
"Happy writing then!"
"Thanks. I guess..."
(click)
Be good to everyone.
(Dear Google people... this was meant to be funny. Satire, get it? Ha ha ha? Just a joke. Please don't have me killed. How about those great pilates home systems? What a deal!)
Governor Mike Rounds of South Dakota has thrown down the hanky to the shiny new Supreme Court by signing a new law into effect banning virtually all abortions within his State.
(Thanks to rising-hegemon.blogspot.com for the quote from the Governor which I'm copying here.)
------------------------- -------
Statement of Gov. Mike Rounds on the Signing Of House Bill 1215
“I have signed House Bill 1215 into law. It is An Act to establish certain legislative findings, to reinstate the prohibition against certain acts causing the termination of an unborn human life, to prescribe a penalty therefore, and to provide for the implementation of such provisions under certain circumstances.
HB 1215 passed South Dakota’s legislature with bi-partisan sponsorship and strong bi-partisan support in both houses. Its purpose is to eliminate most abortions in South Dakota. It does allow doctors to perform abortions in order to save the life of the mother. It does not prohibit the taking of contraceptive drugs before a pregnancy is determined, such as in the case of rape or incest.
In the history of the world, the true test of a civilization is how well people treat the most vulnerable and most helpless in their society. The sponsors and supporters of this bill believe that abortion is wrong because unborn children are the most vulnerable and most helpless persons in our society. I agree with them.
Because this new law is a direct challenge to the Roe versus Wade interpretation of the Constitution, I expect this law will be taken to court and prevented from going into effect this July. That challenge will likely take years to be settled and it may ultimately be decided by the United States Supreme Court. Our existing laws regulating abortions will remain in effect.
The reversal of a Supreme Court opinion is possible. For example, in 1896, the United States Supreme Court ruled in the Plessy versus Ferguson case that a state could require racial segregation in public facilities if the facilities offered to different races were equal. However, fifty-eight years later, the Supreme Court reconsidered that opinion and reversed itself in Brown versus Board of Education. It proclaimed that separate could not produce equal. The 1954 Court realized that the earlier interpretation of our Constitution was wrong.
HB 1215 will give the United States Supreme Court a similar opportunity to reconsider an earlier opinion.
While this is a state and national issue, I want to emphasize that whatever the courts decide, South Dakotans will continue to care about both the unborn child and mother. If we are pro-life, we must recognize the need to take care of women who are faced with a difficult pregnancy. Regardless of the circumstances surrounding the pregnancy, we cannot protect the innocent child, unless we protect and care for the mother. We must help each mother to see the value of the gift that is a child, and nurture the mother for her own sake and for the sake of her child.
Our state is committed to helping greater numbers of pregnant woman who will allow their babies to grow inside them and be born. In both the private and public sector in South Dakota, we have healthcare options, economic assistance before and after birth, adoption services, and, most importantly, people who want to help pregnant women, young mothers and their children.
There are also many people in South Dakota who will continue to help those women who have had abortions in the past. We want those women to know that we care about them, too.”
------------------------- ---------
I'm sure this will thrill many people who see the statement as full of rightness and light. I see it as sincere people trouncing on the rights of women, men, children and the free society they value so much.
Banning abortion is exactly as evil as forcing women to have abortions.
I love the Plessy vs. Ferguson/Brown vs. B.of E. comparison on reversal. It's almost laughable, but it's standard fare.
This is what the governor is really saying. (My words, not his.)
"We've been unsuccessful in convincing every single person to see the world the way we do, therefore we'll force them to live by our values whether they like it or not. And if they disagree with us and act on upon their beliefs - which may be just as sincere as ours? We'll throw their asses in jail - out of loving concern."
Be good to everyone... or, because of the topic (for graceshaker) Be good to every breathing person.
Snow here this morning. I turned over and went back to sleep. I'll work late tonight.
Bad surrogate.
Watched most of the Academy Awards show last night...
I love Jon Stewart but I'd have to give him about a B- for last night. Although, just about every joke he did would have gotten hoots and hollers from a Daily Show studio audience, this was a different crowd and I don't think he and his writers took that into consideration enough, or if they did, they miscalculated how his normal approach would translate. Bet he'd do better next time, but who knows if they'll ever ask him back.
I'd only seen one of the best picture nominees and frankly I don't ever remember ever even hearing about "Crash." Saw "Goodnight and Good Luck" and really enjoyed it. Eventually I'll see them all - as they hit the video stores.
Even though I hadn't seen "Capote" I have no doubt that Philip Seymour Hoffman was masterful. He's been a hidden treasure for ten years or more out there.
For some reason, Reese Witherspoon's acceptance speech reminded me of Sally Field's many years ago. Kept waiting for "You like me. You really like me!" She's sure a cutie though.
I was worried John Travolta would throttle Jon Stewart right there on the stage for the earlier Scientology joke.
Ben Stiller. You love him or you hate him. I love him, but that green-screen gag just didn't work, though it was still funny in the way Carson was and Letterman is when a monologue joke tanks. Funny for not being funny.
I've only seen two movies at a theater all year, and probably less than ten in the last five years, but I do enjoy that goofy Oscar show every year, and I have no idea why.
I liked Cloony standing up for Hollywood when he accepted the supporting actor Oscar. Sure there's a lot of schlock, but they still make some damn good movies, many with uplifting messages and good old fashioned values and often tempered with the heightened social awareness we all could do more to foster in our own lives.
I'd bet most of the folks who castigate Hollywood rarely see the intelligent and thoughtful movies that come out every year by the dozen.
To hear a podcast of this post go to telcaster (dot) com and click on "surrogate."
Happy Sunday morning Boys and Girls!
It's been years since I worked on a Sunday, but today I will for a couple of hours, simply to take advantage of what appears to be some decent weather.
I was thinking about it last night, trying to decide whether I really felt like it, and I remembered my Grandfather being very disappointed in me when I was in High School and I took a job at a shoe store, now long defunct, that required me to work on Sundays once in a while.
I remember asking him why it was okay for HIM to work on Sundays every single week but that, for some reason, it was wrong for me to do it.
He was a preacher.
I don't think he liked the tone of my response... What a smart-ass I was. Thank goodness I've mellowed in old age, huh?
Working at that store exposed me to the first man I ever "knew" was gay, though he didn't ever talk about it. Tom was the assistant manager of the place at the time and was probably about 30 or so. Years later, when the chain went bust (started with a "K") he went to work at another store where's he's been ever since. I still buy good work shoes from him every couple of years though he's got to be nearing retirement now.
Unless he's moved recently, he's lived in the same apartment since I worked with him for a year or so some 35 years ago and he's never driven. I'd see him walking to work every now and again, or on his way to Church on Sundays at the huge Catholic church about a mile and a half from his home, and just down the street from my Mom's. (We used to feel like the only protestants in the neighborhood.)
I've never asked him why he doesn't drive though I've sure been curious. As the years progressed he became a little more open about being gay, at least in a general sense, perhaps because the community in which he lives, as I said, my hometown, has become a minor midwest mecca for gay folks where it seems they can live their lives without feeling threatened.
It's sort of funny. At first, as the "migration" occurred, throughout the late eighties and early nineties, a lot of us were very worried about it, but as gay couples started buying up old houses and fixing them up like crazy all around town and the rest of us benefitted from the steady rise in property values that stems from such gentrification, acceptance seemed to become the self-serving watchword of the day. Oh sure, there are still some narrow minded Bible thumpers who seemed convinced that the town will eventually become a latter day Gamorrah, but even they have given up on the hate rhetoric as most of the rest of the town came to realize that people are just people, no matter who they sleep with - and, to be fair, that even their money is green.
Why, I don't even remember hearing of an egging of the windows of the gay bookstore downtown in years.
I'll bet Tom is at 9:00 Mass right now!
In fact, I need to go see him next time I'm over that way. I need some new work shoes.
Ton Monaghan, one of the dozen or so Michigan billionaires, who made his money selling Dominos Pizzas, is starting up a community in Florida to be named "Ave Maria" meant to foster and promote his particular brand of the Roman Catholic faith.
The city, being built along the everglades in Florida, will eventually be the home of 30,000 like minded souls including around 5000 students he hopes will attend the new Ave Maria Catholic University there, the first new such college built in the U.S. in over forty years.
The bullet points? No abortions will be allowed to be performed in the town and the sale of contraceptive devices will be outlawed within the city's limits.
Why Florida? Michigan said, "Thanks but no thanks."
I wonder if this will stand up in court. Geez, I hope not. There's a real separation of Church and State issue here already, and evidently, according to a quote from Monaghan, he relishes the idea of a fight since it will create lots of publicity.
Funny, I don't remember Dominos being the least bit discriminating about who they took their pizza orders from during the thirty odd years Monaghan ran his company, but maybe I'm wrong about that. I'll have to call a few womens health clinics to see if they were refused lunch time pizza deliveries because of the services they provided. At least that would be consistent... otherwise it comes off like a guy with way too much money and time on his hands playing God.
We'll call it green piety... with extra cheese.
Goggle Tom Monaghan, Catholic City for a bunch of articles.
Be good to everyone within thirty minutes, or it's free.
"It's Twelve'o'eight p.m. in the city and the 'burbs, the sun is shining and traffic is sailing smooth... Next up, from the bad old days, it's a little ditty from those four lads who changed the world by showing up on the Ed Sullivan show; here they are doing one of their hits." (music comes up) "1967's "A Day In The Life, ...it's The BEAtles!" (fades voice mike down, lights cigar, then he slumps back in his chair.)
The engineer stands up from behind the glass and walks into the studio. "Rush?"
He looks up with tired eyes and manages, "What?"
"Rush, we're a talk show. You've been playing old music for three days."
"So?"
"Rush, I thought it was funny on Monday. And I thought, 'Clever! He's really gonna make people take notice!' But then you did it yesterday too for three hours! And now, today, again? What the hell are you thinking?"
"I need a break. Go away."
"Rush. Look at that microphone."
"I see it."
"What color is it?"
"Gold."
"Who are you?"
"I know who I am, damn it."
"What's going on? You won't take any calls, you look like shit. And, as I told you yesterday that affiliates aren't "getting" this. They're pissed! New York has been calling all morning to make sure you were NOT going to do this again today! Couldn't you at least play some Mannheim Steamroller?"
"They suck. I'm sick of them."
(in the background just then we here "now they know how many holes it takes to fill the Al-bert Hallllll!")
"Well... (he's shaking his head, thinking about his next mortgage payment and worried this incredible gig may be doing the toilet-bowl swirl...) Why are you doing this?"
"I just can't... Hang on. (He turns back to the microphone, clears his throat and as he starts up the next song and speaks over the intro in that instantly recognizable baritone.) Next up, how about a little Stevie Won-derrrrrrrrrr... (he clicks off the golden E.I.B. microphone and looks back up at Snerdly.) I just can't lie anymore. I can't do it."
Snerdly is terrified. "Maybe you need to go play golf a while. We can run some best-of shows for a couple of days or get Tony Snow or one of those other guys to sub. You know how much they love it."
"No. They'd lie too. (he looks back at the counsel) This is better."
"No, Rush, It's not. People have expectations of you. What about all those listeners; those ditto-heads?"
"I made-'em, maybe I can unmake-'em."
"Oh Jesus. I'm going to go to a "best-of" right after this song.
"You do and you're fired."
"Maybe, (And he stops for a minute and finally decides. He plays his trump card) but remember, I KNOW about all those Doctors and the phony prescriptions."
Rush slumps back again....
------------------------- ----------------
and then I woke up, and realized it was just a really great dream.
"Fine. Just fine. Just read your post from yesterday. You decide yet?"
"Nah. Still kicking it around. Where are you?"
"I'm in New York. Manhattan."
"Cool. Any special reason?"
"Not really. Well that sounds bad. I'm visiting a friend who's on his way out. He's been dealing with a bunch of different cancers for almost fifteen years and he's about given up."
"Aw. I'm sorry to hear that. Do I know him?"
"I don't think so. Listen, I'm calling because of this new video game they're bringing out. It's supposed to be after the rapture."
"What?"
"Yeah. It's supposed to take place after the rapture and how everyone left will be killing each other and stuff. It's really violent. Sick, from what I hear."
"No way. Who's idea is this? I thought you said the rapture is a bunch of crap?"
"It is. All just a drunken dream. It's being put out by those same morons who did the "Left Behind" series that sold so well, though I don't know if they wrote it themselves or what..."
"You have GOT to be kidding."
"No. I'm not. I thought maybe you could write about it. I'm tired of us getting blamed for all this crap."
"Um. Okay. I'll have to look into it. Surely the same people who protested that TV show will protest this, won't they?"
"Come on surrogate. You know better. This is right up their alley - making Dad and I into killer freaks who do "love" as a side show."
"Yeah. I guess so."
"I swear, I feel like going to talk to Dad about REALLY creating a hell, just for people like this."
"Jesus. Cut it out."
"I know, but... this is too much. I think they could use a little of their own fire and brimstone. Make-'em all bunk with gays and muslims in flaming beds for eternity, their worst nightmare."
"Jesus!"
"I'm kidding. But this is just too much. Will you look into this?"
"Sure. Of course. For now I'll type out this conversation. I've had the answering machine set to record all my calls for a few weeks now."
"Wow. Is that legal?"
"I don't know and I don't care."
"Well that's a nice attitude."
"Yeah, yeah. You get woken in the middle of the night by tele-marketers a time or two and see how you like it!"
"(chuckle) I'll ask Dad to make a special wing for those guys."
"Perfect!"
"I'll call you in a couple of days. Find out what you can?"
"You got it. Thanks for thinking of me."
"I thought you'd have fun with this. I'll talk to you Saturday morning maybe."
"Okay. Thanks.
"Bye."
(click.)
"The tea leaves, they are good today. I see big things..."
Zowie. Seems like the holidays were a couple of weeks ago as opposed to two months ago.
I can't say life has been boring the last couple of months. Some bad things and some good things have happened which has made waking up each morning a bit of an adventure. I suppose we can't ask for more than that!
I'm looking forward to a couple of things and I THINK I've decided to, in some way shape or form, take a plunge back into the business world, this time in the manufacturing end of a business I've known from it's other side for many years.
The question is whether to try to accommodate another fellow who is getting out of it by taking over his poorly managed concern or to just go slowly and start up myself. It would be cheaper to start up on my own in the long run, but it would be faster to just get into it turnkey style... One nice thing is that his price seems to be coming down by the day... If it gets to the magic number I've had in my head since the outset, I'll go ahead and take the plunge... Anyone want to take a trip to California with me and ride back in a big old U Haul with a few tons of equipment? What? Ya chickens!
Maybe I can buy some flowers from LadyG while I'm out there... If I go out there...
At the current price-dropping rate, if he DOES finally get to the number I'm hoping for him to get to, it'll happen Friday - I'd guess about 3:30 PST. (This is a test of the surrogate clairvoyance system. This is only a test. In the event of actual clairvoyance, you'll be directed to...)
Life is funny. Life is sad. Life is challenging.
Life is not for the weak.
As the great warrior said, after munching on some grass...
Sometimes, I be weak.
Sometimes I am bull!
("And sometimes, surrogate, YOU'RE full of bull!")